Compare all cloud storage providers using our cloud storage comparison table, and find the best option for you! The table contains 25+ cloud storage providers to compare on all of their features and pricing.
Scroll
Scroll sideways, or click the scroll buttons; < & >, to see all data.
Sort
Click column headers (
) to sort; click again: change direction.
Filter
Use checkboxes (), select from dropdowns (), or enter a range.
Want to compare two Cloud storage providers side-by-side to quickly spot the differences? For instance: pCloud vs IDrive? Click the link below to use the side-by-side comparison tool.
Footnotes
- Prices in this table are mentioned as we see them (from Europe). You might see different prices and/or currencies depending on your location or region. To confirm the pricing for your region, click the link to be taken to the pricing page.
- The prices mentioned are the regular prices; we don’t keep track of temporary sales or offers in the table. Make sure to always confirm the price on the provider’s pricing page before ordering. While we regularly update prices, the mentioned prices in the table might be out of date. If you notice any discrepancies, please let us know by posting a comment – and we’ll make sure to update it as soon as possible.
Questions or feedback? Leave a comment!
Have any questions about our cloud storage comparison table? Want to see a (new) product added, spotted an error, or have any other feedback? Or do you want to show your appreciation, or just say 'hi'?
Then leave a comment below! We make sure to read and respond to all of them!
Hi,
What a job! I would like to know what would be the ever BEST option (among all those Cloud Storage Corp. in your listing) for Mobile and Web Apps with LIVE feature, videos, pics and text contents, etc. It’s also expected/wanted that they (Mobile and Web Apps) work at a really GREATER SPEED and have HUGE STORAGE capacities.
Any thoughts, advice, and comments will be highly appreciated!
Thank you
In’Jeh
Thanks In’Jeh! So you’re looking to store and serve files to lots of users? Because in that case it sounds like what you need is webhosting (and maybe object storage) rather than cloud storage (file storage).
Hi,
This is really amazing. Found it on reddit. Thanks so much! Maybe adding Amazon Glacier Deep Storage would be helpful? Thanks again!
You’re welcome! I’ll most likely make a separate table for object storage such as Amazon S3 Glacier as they’ve got different features and different pricing structures than the providers in the current table (file storage).
Can you add Hetzner Storage Boxes to the table? Or does it not fit the criteria? Thanks for work you’ve done!
Yes, they’d fit the criteria. I will add them when I next update this table, but that’ll be a while as I’m currently working on other aspects of the site.
very very useful table
one small proposal of improvement:
for 2FA support column, maybe is good idea to add subcolumn or subinfo contains info about method of 2FA that is supported (for example 2FA via sms/ via e-mail/ with Google Authenticator / with hardware security keys)
Thanks! And will look into adding that for the next update of the table.
Would you consider adding Forever by Trustpilot?
They may be new.
Great data!
Thank you.
🙂
Thanks Angela! And I guess you mean Forever.com? Have added them to the list of providers to check out.
Take a look at https://www.storj.io/， the storage price is cheap as low as $3/TB
Thanks – will look into it.
Found a mistake: Apple does not support WebDAV access to their cloud storage. The link goes to the means by which MacOS can connect to a WebDAV server.
Thanks for pointing that out, fixed!
Hello there!
We are missing the Hetzner Storage box and Storage Share products on your comparison sheet.
For more information see here:
https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-box/
https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share/
Would be greatly appreciated if you add them to the list.
I would like to see also Files.fm in this comparison. Have using it for couple of years now!
Missing GoFile and PixelDrain.
Will look into them for the next revision!
FYI, the free version of Infomaniak KDrive is exclusive to part of Europe. The paid version doesn’t have this restriction.
Cbackup either increase in prices or region differences. I’m using sg vpn so….
Box.com also different storage and plan pricing.
Also didnt know if gofile can be included or not, but quite cheap, 3tb for 9$/m or 7.5$/m paid yearly.
Thanks for pointing that out! Looks like CBackup have raised their prices indeed – by a lot! I have just updated the table with the new prices. And I’ve added GoFile to my list of providers to check out.
Hello Guido
Thanks for this awesome table.
Just a not that internxt cli client provides (or so it claims) a WebDAV server [1], so that would be a qualified Yes in that column.
Regards
1- https://github.com/internxt/cli/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-file#internxt-webdav-action
Thanks for the heads up! Looks like they’ve added WebDAV support earlier this year, but I didn’t update it in the table yet. I did just now!
Well done! Many thanks from me 😉
I’ve been looking for such a detailed overview for a long time.
It would be great if you could stay “on the ball” here …
For further recordings / tests I would have …
IONOS Hidrive (https://www.ionos.de/office-loesungen/hidrive-cloud-speicher)
Strato Hidrive (https://www.strato.de/cloud-speicher/)
MyDrive (https://www.mydrive.ch/en/)
Regards
Mikel
You’re welcome! And thanks for the suggestions; I’ll make sure to check them out for the next iteration of this table. Will be a while though, as I’m working on other aspects of the site first.
Hi, thank you for this tool.
Tresorit has a Linux app: https://support.tresorit.com/hc/en-us/articles/216114157-Tresorit-for-Linux-FAQ
Thanks, fixed!
I use telegram, it is a bit slow but it’s unlimited you know.
Yeah, I’ve heard about that trick/loophole before. Wouldn’t really trust that as a long-term cloud storage solution for important files though, as they might pull the plug on this any time. It’s also missing a lot of features that actual cloud storage providers do offer. But it could be useful in some situations, sure.
Google does not seem to be offering their 200 GB plan anymore
I think the 200 GB option doesn’t show up until you’re already on the 100 GB plan. I’ve actually upgraded to the 200 GB plan myself last month. It’s also showing even more options for me now (5-30 TB).
Here’s a screenshot I took just now:
I also just checked with another Google account that doesn’t any Google One subscription, and it indeed doesn’t show the 200 GB option, or the 5-30 TB options (there does seem to be a discount going on by the way):
So to get the 200 GB option, I think you have to get the 100 GB option first.
If it’s not too much to ask, is it possible to add some filler columns at the end/right so when I scroll right I can have the names of the services just besides the columns with the info I need.
Hi, if you’ve got trouble seeing which provider corresponds with which in the table (especially when it comes to the last few columns that are the furthest away), you could try resizing the window to make it smaller so they’re closer. There’s also a (slight) hover color: so if you hover the cursor over a row it becomes a bit darker to highlight a row.
I have adjusted the hover color to make it a bit more obvious just now. Let me know if that helped.
Oh, and since you don’t have a cursor on mobile devices (phone/tablet), you can click on the row to highlight it instead.
Proton Drive does not have a Linux app
Thanks for pointing that out, fixed!
Thanks for the excellent article. On the one hand, there are some great options staying at Rclone.org. Among them, Nextcloud is a great addition to the cloudflare suite, so we’d definitely recommend it. P.S. I found a mistake in the Lifetime100GB/amaryllo cell. 😅
Thanks for the compliment!
I’m not sure what the mistake is for the Amaryllo 100 GB lifetime option? It’s $49.99 at Amaryllo.us, or $29.99 if you get it from StackSocial.com.
Mega has a bandwidth limit.
Thanks, found it, seems to be 5GB per day for free accounts according to multiple sources, even though Mega doesn’t state this themselves. Updated the table.
Hello,
Thanks for your work. Very useful I was starting doing this when i found it.
I suggest you to add as they are also quite popular:
https://www.strato.nl/
https://www1.sugarsync.com/
And this one but now how is the situation with Russia is not a good option.
https://cloud.mail.ru/
Regards,
You’re welcome! And thanks for the suggestions – will look into them, and take them into consideration for the next revision.
This is really just wonderful, thank you. There are 2 things I’d think would improve it, though. First, it would be super helpful to also show the prices in $/GB (and/or €/GB). There are so many different sizes and terms, a price-per-gig is the only way to quickly compare the plain price of the storage. Second, as others have said, you should add some more providers, AWS for one. Their plan is interesting: pictures don’t count(!). And, maybe others. Someone mentioned Terabox — I’ve never heard of them and your objections seem reasonable. But, why leave them out? The more options and data, the more useful the tool. … At the least, you should try to develop simple, consistent criteria for what providers will be included.
You’re welcome! I’ve considered adding a price per GB, but since the price/GB is different depending on the size of the plan you choose, I’d have to double the amount of pricing columns. I assumed most people roughly know how much storage they need, and the table already allows you to compare prices for different storage sizes right now.
More providers will be added for in the future for sure – but it’ll take a while since I’m busy working on other comparison tables and adding other functionality to this site first. When it comes to object storage (AWS, Azure, Wasabi, etc), I have planned to create a separate comparison table for that, since both the use case as well as pricing structure for those (price/GB makes more sense here) is different.
As for Terabox – it’s already in the comparison table right now, and has been since the first version of this table. And I agree; more options and data is better. I don’t have any specific criteria to either add or leave a provider out of table right now (will think on that though); so far I’ve just added everything I knew about and could easily find. So more options (that have been pointed out to me) will follow!
Hi,
Can you add wasabi to your next updated table?
Hi Ema,
As far as I can tell, they only seem to provide ‘object storage’, which I consider to be in a different category from the ‘file storage’ providers I’ve listed in the table above. I’ve got plans to make another table to compare object storage (including AWS, Google Cloud, iDrive e2, Backblaze B2, etc) in the future, but it’ll be a while before I’ve got a new table on that subject published.
What do you think about Terabox? It provides 1TB on the free package, if it works & is safe then I guess would be a better option for most of us
Hi Lucy,
I’ve tried Terabox out for a bit, and it just seems extremely slow when I try to download anything (using the free account). Also, I’m not sure they actually provide 1 TB for free. Yes – your account will show 1024 GB of space available, but here: https://www.terabox.com/cloud-storage-pricing-plans it also says your free account is limited to 20 files:
Since the max file size for uploads is 4 GB, I’ve listed them as giving you up to 80 GB for free at most. I was actually able to upload more than 20 files, but I’m not sure if they’ll be ‘saved’, as in; kept available and not automatically deleted after a while.
Other than that, don’t like the fact that they show ads (on the free account), and how they keep nagging you about upgrading. For instance, for every file you download, the web app will show a pop-up that says that premium (paid) accounts have better download speeds – and then continue to download your selected files at a snails pace.
So while I haven’t tested them enough to give a full review, so far Terabox just comes across as the ‘Temu of cloud storage’ to me. That said, it’s a Japanese company now, but they started in China – which also leads some people to not trust them with their personal files, or to install the app on their phones.
Great Analysis, Thanks !
Can you pl include Digiboxx into your table, It is India based cloud storage service, servers are in India.
Cheers !
Hi Chaithra, never heard of them before, but looks like an interesting option. I’ve added them to the list of providers to research for when I’ll update this table!
Hey love your work, maybe you can add Shadow Drive.
https://shadow.tech/en-GB/drive
Offers 20GB for free users.
It is not available in NA yet though but it is in Europe.
Thanks! And noted – will look into them for the next revision!
I need a linux compatible storage solution that supports symbolic links without any interpretation or modification of them. Your chart would benefit from a column marked “supports symbolic links (symlinks)” or something similar. Thank you.
Hi Gregben, I haven’t really seen any cloud storage providers mention whether they support symlinks in my research so far, but I’ll look into adding that for the next revision of this table.
Can you investigate Telebox? Supposedly 2TB (“2048GB” on their website) for $3.59/month – $34.99/year.
Interesting. Added it to my list of services to check out for when I next update the table.
Proton has released Proton Docs, which means you’ll be able to able to edit and collaborate on text documents stored on your Proton Drive. As of now it’s only text files, so no spreadsheets or presentations. Updated the table to reflect this change.
This is a new and improved version of the Cloud Storage comparison table from this Google Sheet.
A few more cloud storage providers have been added, as well as a few extra features and pricing options to compare them on. Pricing has also been updated, and now contains links that take you directly to the pricing page where the price is mentioned. Review scores have also been updated.
Unlike the original Google Sheet, this comparison table allows for:
Also, this table uses conditional formatting, which means cells are color-coded for their features, so you can more easily spot the pros & cons of each option.
Even more features to compare on will be added soon. I’m also looking into a few more providers to add – if you have any suggestions, let me know!
The original Google sheet can still be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cEd65XDW3gBHnRsJ0rbq3V_B28mKySHiMPAZvArHiiA/, but won’t receive any more updates.
Hello,
It is very nice and detailed comparison list, but you missed some good ones like SpiderOak (One Backup), FileLu, and Zoolz.
Thanks! And I’ll look into adding the additional providers you mentioned.